Sunday, August 30, 2009

The 00's Novelty Problem


No pants, no inclusion.

There weren't a whole lot of tectonic shifts in the aesthetic movement of pop in the 00's (there were plenty of shifts, they just didn't feel tectonic from where I was standing), but there were structural shifts in how it was consumed, processed, paid for. And there was also a shift in how novelty got to flaunt its stuff on the charts, I think, perhaps collateral damage of the Ceiling Falling in the latter half of the decade. With fewer enormous record-smashing (in any meaningful way) successes, it became harder to tell exactly how to distinguish between what might feel like novelties and what undeniably WERE novelties.

It's interesting to compare from one side of the decade to the other. In 2000, Dynamite Hack were acoustic schlubbers doing (ambiguously condescending) gangsta rap, "Boyz in the Hood," and it was (to my 14-year-old-ish brain) kind of a big deal. It came naturally from the kinds of parody songs they did a lot on the radio at that time, like Bill Clinton singing something about blowjobs over "Sex and Candy." By the end of the decade, there seem to be acts whose raison d'etre seem to be doing ambiguously condescending gangsta shtick, from cover versions to Brokencyde. And I would really hesitate to call any of it novelty, precisely because there's so much fucking context for it.

In 2000 we had "Because I Got High," an utterly retarded minimalist near-rap singalong, and by 2004 we had, e.g., "Laffy Taffy" on top of the charts, and now we have "Turn My Swag On," an even less self-aware totally retarded near-rap singalong (with better production and more style) and there's no question that the latter isn't novelty. The former gets a tick in my book, only because it still sounds to me like the weirdest number 1 of the decade.

In 2000 we had a kiddie niche, and its nichedom in part reflected how novelty it may have been -- Britney Spears could email her heart without it being novelty, but Aaron Carter couldn't get away with beating Shaq without the label. And there's a seemingly crystal-clear difference between Britney's emails and Brittney's (Cleary, later "Nikki" of "Summertime Guys" semi-fame) I.M.'s in "I.M. Me" from 2001.

But how about the modified Kelly C. Dr. Luke-isms of Avril's "Girlfriend" or Katy Perry's "I Kissed a Girl" or "Hot and Cold"? Or P!nk's "So What"? All practically waterboarding you with F-U-N, a not-uncommon feature of plenty of novelty songs, and none of them feel "novelty," or novel. Lady Gaga's disco sticks have to compete with Pussycat Dolls and R. Kellyisms and lord knows what else; I'd say tentatively that the 2000 "Thong Song" actually suffers a similar dilemma, but its novelty inclusion feels a lot safer than "LoveGame" or "Birthday Sex" or "Ignition."

A definition of novelty might be appropriate here. Roughly I'd say that novelty songs create their own context, either by aesthetically standing resolutely outside of their time (think Napoleon XIV or "Transfusion" or "Fish Heads") or by shamelessly reveling in its time's shallowest fads and tropes (direct parodies fall in this category, as do Disco Ducks).

And neither definition seems right. Are the Three Little Fishies in the Itty Bitty Poo "shamefully reveling in their time" or "standing resolutely outside of it?" Er, both. Neither. Whatever, it's funny, right? But that doesn't necessarily make it novelty, either.

So novelty, instead, is much like other genre work, ruling through exceptions and mutations and accidents what fits into the category in an ad hoc way; conventions change over time (when Christina Aguilera does 40's novelty, it becomes dead-in-the-water pastiche; when indie does knowing disco somehow blunts any sense of surprise). For the most part you can't play by the same rules twice, but even that's not strictly true. See: Brown, Julie or Six, Electric.

There's a specific strand of Novelty Music, that, like other capitalized versions of common phenomena, has its preservation benefits and rut-heavy pitfalls. The Dr. Demento strand of an archeology and historicization of novelty music as a Proper Thing offers both a safe haven for undeniable novelties (Weird Als and Fish Heads and Head Cheeses and Little Bitty Poos) but also to some extent puts a damper on the novel effect of it. What happens to "outsider" music when we listen to it as "insiders"? Or pretend that Star Trek jokes have a shelf life? It's a mixed bag, on the whole a good thing (in part because Demento always had a soft spot for self-made, no-budget songs, the equivalent of a MySpace trawler of the 80's in many ways) but not really a tenable definition for 00's novelty. The stuff that fits most cleanly into Demento's novelty world -- Weird Al, Jesus H. Christ -- also feel like safe choices.

In part this is because much of the best novelty of the decade was absolutely fucking filthy. When hoar-pop and strip club rap is a normative style, you have to do something really nasty, really weird, or really disturbing to stand out. "Wait (The Whisper Song)" makes it, even though it couldn't help but usher in a legit snap subgenre, Eamon's "Fuck It (I Don't Want You Back)" makes it because no one took up his call to curse out an ex via smoove R&B stylings (on the other hand, Jeremih is a testament to how nasty you could come ON to a girl in smoove R&B stylings without it seeming particularly abnormal). Tila Tequila's presence, paired with the over-the-top mock outrage of "I Love U," qualifies her for inclusion, though neither the song nor the personality alone would necessarily qualify her. Heidi Montag is just as 15-minutes (and just as despised) but her music simply isn't "novelty" by any stretch of the imagination.

I've decided to put together a 50-to-100-track compilation of novelty songs, and I find it harder to sort as I get further along in the decade. "Lip Gloss" yes, "Vans" no? Or vice versa? Or both? Do I pick a hyphy track? (Jonathan Bradley says no, and especially not "Ghost Ride It" -- I say yes, and especially "Ghost Ride It": Ghostbusters sample, self-reference of fad, description of illicit activity as instruction manual. And yet...he's right, which hyphy songs DON'T include some approximate version of that stuff?)

Which tracks do I pick by which comedy artists, whose work has never really had a rise-to-the-top consensus favorite (Flight of the Conchords, say, or Lonely Island)? I'm just choosing the ones I think are best, whereas I wouldn't necessarily choose a Julie Brown track over "Homecoming Queen's Got a Gun" even if I liked it more.

Which one-hit-wonders do I pick? Which dance crazes? "Soulja Boy (Crank Dat)" somehow doesn't feel right, yet I'm picking "Da Stanky Legg"? Do I need a jerkin' track? A snap track (I have one anyway)? How do I deal with Internet memes? Why doesn't it feel right to include "Chocolate Rain" but it feels imperative to include the "Numa Numa" song? Am I wrong, or is it getting a lot harder to figure out what novelty actually means? Is the world getting smaller or am I just casting a wider net?

List your theories, contradictions, and favorites below...


3 comments:

  1. There is a whole world of Gwen Stefani / Fergie tracks which tiptoe the line of novelty and credibility. They survive cos who made them, but are Fergie or Gwen really not knocking out the best novelty singles of the decade. Sampling the Sound Of Music, making a crude sexual reference about THE WRONG BRIDGE IN LONDON. Its a world series of kooky, and only one of these two will win.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Actually I think Fergie and Gwen are good examples of what I'm talking about here. "Wind It Up" might count toward some kind of novelty count, but honestly it just doesn't feel that weird in context. I can't imagine it anywhere near pop radio in 2000, sure, but I also didn't really care about it one way or the other on pop radio c. 2006. As for Fergie (who I think I once called the Queen of WTF-pop), after "My Humps" the combination of "London Bridge" and "Fergalicious" and "Big Girls Don't Cry" and "Glamorous" just don't seem like that big of a deal. To paraphrase Hilary Duff (who doesn't have a single novelty song on the mix so far, though closest would probably be "The Math" or "Gypsy Woman," neither of which would make it), kooky doesn't feel so kooky -- trying to fit a square into a circle is no big deal.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I forgot that it was you who dubbed Fergie "WTF-pop" -- one of my favourite tags of the decade!

    I wonder if maybe modern pop has by and large openly embraced silliness more and more, which is maybe why it's harder to distinguish between what is and what isn't a novelty? I mean, I don't know, I haven't conducted a song by song study of the Top 40 across 50 years, but it seems like a lot of the songs that were considered novel in the '50s and '70s (I come back to those two decades first for some reason) were clearly a breach of sorts from what would've been considered smart, excellent (not unfunny but not as outlandishly silly) pop. Not that a lot of novelties aren't smart and/or great pop, but the classic novelty record sounded like it was conceived with its own novel status in mind; it was pretty clear to the listener that you weren't meant to take them very seriously (in fact, you'd sound ridiculous treating them too seriously). Even as a kid who grew up in the era of K-Tel novelties, it was obvious that songs like "Disco Duck" and "The Night Chicago Died" were meant as pure goofs. Of course there were other songs where the line of demarcation maybe wasn't so clear or where songs with an obvious novel bent also had more interesting stuff than mere ha-ha going on beneath the surface too ("Kung Fu Fighting" comes to mind). Still, as preteens we pretty much knew what the Goofy Greats of that week's Top 40 were; there was little confusion in that regard.

    Maybe what I'm grasping at here re: current pop is that a lot of stuff seems to just blur the lines, a la "Kung Fu Fighting"? Something like "Fergalicious" or "My Humps" would be a case in point. I used to call Amy Winehouse's "Rehab" a great novelty because it strikes me as a funny song, I think she has a really oddball voice, and there's something overtly old-timey about the thing (and not just in a copping-Motown-riffs kind of way; it reminds me a bit of Hurricane Smaith's 1971 hit, "Oh Babe What Would You Say," which had a real vaudeville feel), and it just sounded to me (initially anyway) to be almost designed as such. Obviously, I was wrong. Amy Winehouse is taken seriously by lots of people, she's had other hits (all extremely minor, to my ears.... I kind of hated her album tbh), so the context she's created for herself or which has been created for her (?) seems to preclude her from the status. My initial impressions of "Rehab" don't jive with the world's at all (and I ended up playing it a fair bit at weddings... and yeah, it sounds fantastic in that context).

    Anyway, a definite (more inarguable) one for you to consider is Audio Club's "Sumthin' Serious," which is the goofiest song in recent years I can think of to insist that it's "serious" (and yet, whenever the knuckleheaded rapper insists that "it's something suuurrious" I always think he's saying, "it's so absuuurrd").

    ReplyDelete